Page 3 of 5
Re: AAARRRGGGHHHH ... it's Children in Need!
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 7:23 pm
by Bronson Lee
Dreadful........ but for one fleeting glimpse of her fantastic body .
Re: AAARRRGGGHHHH ... it's Children in Need!
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 7:49 pm
by goldenballs
Is he the one with the 'tash? if so, he was doing a bit of 'acting' the other week in Hollyoaks. I have to use the word acting in the loosest sense when talking about Hollyoaks. Of course, i only watch it for the babes.
Re: AAARRRGGGHHHH ... it's Children in Need!
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 8:16 pm
by steve56
well im off to watch bullit now forgot robert duvall was in it.goodnight all.
Re: AAARRRGGGHHHH ... it's Children in Need!
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 8:23 pm
by IdolDroog
that CIN year a couple of years back where john cleese said "how dare u think ur entitled to this evenings wonderful entertainment for free etc etc " at the time it seemed quite poignant, but with hindsight the license fee works out at 30p a day and prob about 10-15p of that goes on evening and prime time soooo technically they are taking away 8 hours of regular entertainment which we are ENTITLED to (its what we pay for) replacing it with something else and then trying to make u feel guilty for watching it......clev-va
Re: AAARRRGGGHHHH ... it's Children in Need!
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 10:13 pm
by WillieBo
No, it's all just a complete and utter crock of shite. If I want to give my money to charidee mate, then it's my choice.
Try St. Dunstans. Now that is worthwhile.
Re: Ulrikas Bald Fanny
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2003 6:43 am
by Ace
Yes, Magoo is correct. What CIN should do is offer to re-run that scene and I guarantee all dads and other blokes would reach for the phone with their credit card details
Re: Ulrikas Bald Fanny
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2003 11:42 am
by jj
Yes, why should we miss out on what 3 000 000 other men have already seen.........
Re: Ulrikas Bald Fanny
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:47 pm
by Lizard
Seen it!,- been between it!