egafd.com

It seems that I am onto something!
100 dissenting scientists see above link!
Mike Freeman.

[quote]But I'm not debating with you.[/quote]

Thank you for that admission. At least you're on the way to admitting all you've done is call me a 'pretentious prick', and say I 'spout drivel' or 'talk shit'. You admit you're not debating, but also say you're not name-calling. If this is so, can I ask the point of your posts?

[quote]I did not engaage with you, you engaged with me. My initial reply was to the original poster, eroticartist, then you butted in.[/quote]

I'm sorry but you're wrong. I started conversing with eroticartist, pornhistorian and mrmcfister. It was you who engaged in conversation with me first, here. If I'm proven wrong in this I'll apologise.

As you can see, you added nothing to the discussion and just attacked me with no explanation or justification for your remark. For the record I don't mind you criticising my points or engaging in conversation. Regardless of what you might assume of me I'm not as arrogant as to assume immunity from criticism. But please try to cut out the name calling, childishness, and, in this most recent case, false accusations of 'butting in'.

I pray, can you or anyone show where I 'butted in' and 'engaged in conversation with you'?

I'm a fair man and will nearly always apologise when I'm mistaken. Sometimes, to my shame, I don't always live up to my own standards but I don't think this is one of those times, JRP. In fact, if I may be so bold, I think I apologise when I needn't more than deny apology where it's polite to.

[quote]Apology accepted.[/quote]

I think you're confused.

[quote]Just adds to my confusion.[/quote]

Damn I'm good.

Sam Slater wrote:


>>


Ever seen those "end of the world is nigh" blokes with sandwich boards around Fargate, Sam?

Well - there's an opening for you if you can't get a proper day-job when you've finished your studies.

So it can't all be bad can it?!

- Eric