Re: AAARRRGGGHHHH ... it's Children in Need!
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:23 pm
I am one of those if you don't like it don't watch it people, so I don't watch it.
Few points, I'll keep it short I can't really be arsed:
re money going to rich charity chief executives = bollocks (not allowed)
re Terry Wogan's pay :completely agree is to much however someone has to front it and whoever it is will (sadly as far as I am concerned) want paying.
re TW fronting it. He is successful (fact) and it's a big risk for Children in Need to get rid of him.
I suspect that C-I-N won't be as well supported this year because of TW's pay, that will keep most of you happy but less support means less money to the people it helps.
Funny isn't it when a porn star or someone relating to the industry begs for money for their charity you all quite rightly come running saying well done but when its something not involving you its completely different.
Few points, I'll keep it short I can't really be arsed:
re money going to rich charity chief executives = bollocks (not allowed)
re Terry Wogan's pay :completely agree is to much however someone has to front it and whoever it is will (sadly as far as I am concerned) want paying.
re TW fronting it. He is successful (fact) and it's a big risk for Children in Need to get rid of him.
I suspect that C-I-N won't be as well supported this year because of TW's pay, that will keep most of you happy but less support means less money to the people it helps.
Funny isn't it when a porn star or someone relating to the industry begs for money for their charity you all quite rightly come running saying well done but when its something not involving you its completely different.