THE ANSWER (perhaps)
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2002 8:11 pm
It's not so much the presence of a camera that's the problem but the fact that the guys are being watched and expected to perform by other men. I've done amateur hardcore filming using myself as the male performer and had no problem performing with women I'd never met before, but it was MY camera and there was no one else there apart from me and the young ladies in question. I expect if a bunch of guys were there telling me what to do things would be different!
I also filmed two other guys, one of whom was able to perform in front of me no problem. The secret? Well, I can't be 100% sure but I reckon it was because he was very young, i.e. 19. and was still full of youthful libido. Ideally I think should use guys who are still at that stage in life when one gets a stiffy every time the wind changes. Admittedly most men have gone past this phase before they reach filmable age so unless you want to end up residing at the same address as Jonathan King you'll have to hope that there are enough 18 or 19 year olds who haven't grown out of it. I found one though, so it can't be too tricky. I think the fact that the woman he was paired with was a lot older than his usual girlfriends (i.e. in her early 30s) was also a turn on for him too. (It was the very accommodating Claire from your very own Housewife Fantasies, since you ask!)
Anyway, I don't know what you're complaining about if you can get ?300 off someone just for watching him fail to get it up. In fact, why not make a whole industry out of it? You could offer a prize of regular work for anyone who can get it up, with the usual entry fee. If you give them all 30 minutes each you're making ?600 per hour.
You could call the contest "Porn Stars" and have a panel of annoying judges presiding over the succession of wannabee Marinos. If you put it out of video it would be sure to be a winner - as a comedy at least.
Incidentally, when you have auditions for guys do you tend to use the same woman as the 'tester' and if so who is it? I hope the poor thing hasn't had her ego too damaged by seeing all those flacid members!
I also filmed two other guys, one of whom was able to perform in front of me no problem. The secret? Well, I can't be 100% sure but I reckon it was because he was very young, i.e. 19. and was still full of youthful libido. Ideally I think should use guys who are still at that stage in life when one gets a stiffy every time the wind changes. Admittedly most men have gone past this phase before they reach filmable age so unless you want to end up residing at the same address as Jonathan King you'll have to hope that there are enough 18 or 19 year olds who haven't grown out of it. I found one though, so it can't be too tricky. I think the fact that the woman he was paired with was a lot older than his usual girlfriends (i.e. in her early 30s) was also a turn on for him too. (It was the very accommodating Claire from your very own Housewife Fantasies, since you ask!)
Anyway, I don't know what you're complaining about if you can get ?300 off someone just for watching him fail to get it up. In fact, why not make a whole industry out of it? You could offer a prize of regular work for anyone who can get it up, with the usual entry fee. If you give them all 30 minutes each you're making ?600 per hour.
You could call the contest "Porn Stars" and have a panel of annoying judges presiding over the succession of wannabee Marinos. If you put it out of video it would be sure to be a winner - as a comedy at least.
Incidentally, when you have auditions for guys do you tend to use the same woman as the 'tester' and if so who is it? I hope the poor thing hasn't had her ego too damaged by seeing all those flacid members!