Page 5 of 10
Re: One law for them another for us
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:41 am
by Sam Slater
I admit, the table only shows who's best at covering up corruption to some degree, but it's a table all the same, and since it's the only information available to us, Mike is hypocritical given the facts we have.
Re: One law for them another for us
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:55 am
by Sam Slater
I'm specifically talking about Mike calling the UK establishment corrupt. It's hypocritical and rather funny given that he left a supposed corrupt nation in favour of one that is supposedly even more corrupt.
Censorship is a separate issue that I don't have much argument against, because I mostly agree with you on that matter.
Re: One law for them another for us
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:05 am
by Sam Slater
Ah, but if he'd moved to Finland and then called the UK corrupt, I guess he'd be standing on firmer ground in this debate (given the facts available for us to mull over).
Italy probably is a nicer place if you want to get away from the hustle and bustle of the UK.............and the weathers better! Not so nice if you're wanting to escape corruption though.........lol.
Re: One law for them another for us
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:34 am
by eroticartist
Alice,
Warren has digressed away from the subject of my thread "One law for them another for us" and launched a general attack on various things he thinks I have done.
Mike.