egafd.com

It all depends on context doesn't it? They are all politicians who have used the false excuse of "National Security" to attack the human rights of their own citizens. In that context, they belong in the same sentence.

BOLLOCKS

Randy,
I do think that your repeated use of the same expletive to express your disagreement shows a certain lack of vocabulary. !oops!
Mike Freeman

I don't think he understands the subject at all Mike - he just thinks that saying BOLLOCKS is big and clever.

Actually it's because I simply be arsed replying to idiots.

I said to Mike in an earlier post that it doesn't matter what anyone says to him or you, for that matter, be it fact or myth it's simply pointless.

You have your point I have mine nothing said will change it.

Rather than waste my time I just use BOLLOCKS.

Randy,
All you do is use the same expletive which shows a complete lack of vocabulary!
Mike Freeman.

Andy,
Why do you waste your time on this forum if you are not going to discuss the issue.
Mike Freeman.

(1) BOLLOCKS

(2) respect people they should respect you back

!grin!

BOLLOCKS

I've already said that there is no point in discussing the issue Mike because our points of view differ that much there simply is no point.

I say BOLLOCKS mainly to save time but also to give my opinion on the opinion raised.