egafd.com

Complaining of corruption and moving to a less corrupt country backs up your criticisms does it not? It's kinda consistent and logical. You don't move to Morocco all the while complaining about the heat of Scottish summers.

Maybe you're looking at life through the wrong end of that telescope Keith? !laugh!

Keith, you've been smoking that stuff again.

I never mentioned Labour, voting, nor rights.......

Of course Mike has the right to criticise the UK, Mother Teresa or Ghandi's sexual perversions if he wants.......it's free speech.

All I'm saying is it's hypocritical and funny, considering his location on the planet right now.

Chill.......

Oh please........

If the table had said the UK was more corrupt than Italy, you'd have been grinning from ear to ear........and what's with the 'Daily Mail' jibes? Just because I brought a 'supposed' table to your attention which didn't back up your viewpoint, all of a sudden it's something you'd find in a right wing rag?

Come on Keith, it was you that actually asked for proof that Italy was more corrupt than the UK. Someone provides proof and you criticise the document, and then associate the Daily Mail with it!

I mean, if you're going to criticise an official paper, and all the resources they may have had at their disposal to produce the table, how was Wazza (a lone secondary school teacher) going to provide any proof to your satisfaction? Really then, you asked a duff question of Warren because you didn't have any proof to the contrary, or anything that gave the assumption Warren was wrong.

And as for hypocrisy.....

Mike isn't hypocritical in the sense that he supports Italian corruption but condemns UK corruption. I'm saying he's hypocritical (or at least amazingly taking the piss) to criticise a less corrupt country than the one he now resides due to his own personal choice (he wasn't born there).

Lets be honest here Keith.... If I came on here today, slagging of the Finnish government, or judicial system, I'd find it quite fair for a Finnish citizen to maybe hold me to account of my own countries corruption levels first, before I started slagging off his nations record, (a kettle - pot - black scenario). I'd also guess if you were privy to said information, that you may also point me to the facts.

I'm not talking about his right to criticise and point the finger........(just to clear that up), but I do think it's funny and hypocritical of him nonetheless.

Sam,
In the UK if someone enters your house illegally, rapes your wife or daughter, attacks you with a weapon and you kill them you will be charged with murder. In Italy you would remain at liberty because you were in the right and this is justice.

Mike.

Alice,
You seem to think that selling adult films to adults is a privilege extended to filmmakers by a benevolent government!

I think that in a democracy adults should not be treated like children whereby another adult looks at a film and says "I am not corrupted by it but you maybe" therefore I am not going to allow you to see this film.

There should be no censorship for adults of films made by consenting adult actors in which no permanent injury is inflicted.

This is called freedom of expression and if curtailed by censorship it reveals the state as authoritarian.
Mike.