Re: What is "class"? & What "class" are you?
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:13 pm
"*Not inferring WZR is a twat in this case."
Them presumably you are inferring that Officer Dibbs is a twat?
But why? I was only speaking up for my fellow proletarians - telling a few home truths to the middleclass sorts who make out everything is benignly cushty as it is. You're doing just the same thing as other comfortable (dare I say smug?) middleclass leftists - you're sneering and denigrating the aspirations and desires of working folk to better themselves - materialistically or not. You talk the talk of equality, but at the same time you don't want working folk to get ahead. You also assume the mantle of moral superiority (a common middleclass failing) suggesting that the workingman?s pursuit of material comfort is immoral and unlighted. But who are you to judge and say what is immoral and what is not? Working people have a different world view ? why should your middleclass view trump their?s?
Fudgey, do you really think Officer Dibbs enters these frays to big himself up and pretend that he is ?upper class? ? even though I?m always going on about my chavy heritage, chavy exploits, and speaking up for the working man? Or is that just a device to try and neutralize the real stinging point of my attacks ? that the interests and aspirations of the working classes and the middle classes are quite divergent. And that the middle classes are arrogantly imposing their moral values and outlook on those they see as beneath them, or ?differently abled??
And as for our lives and their ?meaning?. Well, don?t we all want to imbue our lives with meaning ? particularly if our lives are ?sad? ones? Would you deny that right to blue collar folk? Would you deny them the right to achieve something on their own and have a taste of the self-respect that achievement, success and winning in any field brings? Or would that be a threat to you and your worldview? Can?t have working people getting to powerful or above themselves ? they might start demanding that government take notice of their small ?c? conservative views, eh?
I agree that "Class is a relic, a memory, an archaelogical, entombed superirioity complex" - which is why the socially concerned, Labour voting, middleclass are so keen to pretend that it doesn?t exist or that it doesn?t matter. They are embarrassed by being middleclass, by being generally superior in intellect and income (sometimes inappropriate income) to those of the lower classes or working classes. They are embarrassed because this directly conflicts with the philosophy of universal equality that they have blithely adopted. People cannot be equal, or of equal ability if, at the same time, they are so obviously not. It does not compute. So the middleclass left gets round this by tying to pretend that class doesn't matter. But it matters a great deal to those who do not have the power, privilege, opportunity and economic means - the lower classes, the working classes. The only time class doesn?t matter is when you're sitting pretty.
Officer Dibble
Them presumably you are inferring that Officer Dibbs is a twat?
But why? I was only speaking up for my fellow proletarians - telling a few home truths to the middleclass sorts who make out everything is benignly cushty as it is. You're doing just the same thing as other comfortable (dare I say smug?) middleclass leftists - you're sneering and denigrating the aspirations and desires of working folk to better themselves - materialistically or not. You talk the talk of equality, but at the same time you don't want working folk to get ahead. You also assume the mantle of moral superiority (a common middleclass failing) suggesting that the workingman?s pursuit of material comfort is immoral and unlighted. But who are you to judge and say what is immoral and what is not? Working people have a different world view ? why should your middleclass view trump their?s?
Fudgey, do you really think Officer Dibbs enters these frays to big himself up and pretend that he is ?upper class? ? even though I?m always going on about my chavy heritage, chavy exploits, and speaking up for the working man? Or is that just a device to try and neutralize the real stinging point of my attacks ? that the interests and aspirations of the working classes and the middle classes are quite divergent. And that the middle classes are arrogantly imposing their moral values and outlook on those they see as beneath them, or ?differently abled??
And as for our lives and their ?meaning?. Well, don?t we all want to imbue our lives with meaning ? particularly if our lives are ?sad? ones? Would you deny that right to blue collar folk? Would you deny them the right to achieve something on their own and have a taste of the self-respect that achievement, success and winning in any field brings? Or would that be a threat to you and your worldview? Can?t have working people getting to powerful or above themselves ? they might start demanding that government take notice of their small ?c? conservative views, eh?
I agree that "Class is a relic, a memory, an archaelogical, entombed superirioity complex" - which is why the socially concerned, Labour voting, middleclass are so keen to pretend that it doesn?t exist or that it doesn?t matter. They are embarrassed by being middleclass, by being generally superior in intellect and income (sometimes inappropriate income) to those of the lower classes or working classes. They are embarrassed because this directly conflicts with the philosophy of universal equality that they have blithely adopted. People cannot be equal, or of equal ability if, at the same time, they are so obviously not. It does not compute. So the middleclass left gets round this by tying to pretend that class doesn't matter. But it matters a great deal to those who do not have the power, privilege, opportunity and economic means - the lower classes, the working classes. The only time class doesn?t matter is when you're sitting pretty.
Officer Dibble