I do not mind doing my free galleries on the free sites. However, it pissed me off that people have a go at people that go out and shoot content then just try to make some money back from it. Phil M got into trouble because he put a dialer on a web cam site...what a fucking shame..you have to pay to see Phils hard work..ok he put down the deposit on the flats and paid the girls but fucking heaven forbid he would try to get his cash back, even though he put a free cam, running at a lower refresh rate on the outside. Dam...Phil sell your arse on the street to satisfy these people...Linda Leigh shot content..exclusive for her site and got Teresa May in as well...she paid for that and Andrew Jones posts it all on the newsgroup..Andrew..call me 07968659236. [Don't] try to post some of my content.
Listen you [lot]..get a life and try to create a site of your own without stealing content...you could not even afford the bandwidth fees, mine now run at $5k per month and will increase when I add my new 6 sites.
Just the Krome sounding off...
P.S. Never liked Linda Leigh but do not wish to see someone ripped off like that or Phil dissed like that...
P.P.S. All the content I grab from newsgroups etc I have deals with the people that shot it so I can use it safely as they make cash out of my pay sites.
bgafd and alt.fan.televionx ponces
-
alec
Re: Why has my post been deleted
Don't know - it was deleted by another moderator before I could read it.
I have just edited krome's post to remove threats and personal abuse, but I agree with the points he was trying to make.
I have just edited krome's post to remove threats and personal abuse, but I agree with the points he was trying to make.
-
observer
Re: Why has my post been deleted
Bad move...everybodys post was removed EXCEPT Krome...
I guess this board is only for people who are liked or who give stuff free...
That is wrong...and I dont care what other people think...
I guess this board is only for people who are liked or who give stuff free...
That is wrong...and I dont care what other people think...
-
alec
Re: bgafd and alt.fan.televionx ponces
I think some of you naively think that it is possible to watch this board every minute of the day. I have been in touch with woodgnome who was the first to take action on this thread. We were both working on it at the same time which caused some of this confusion. He copied the threads he deleted and I copy them below in edited form starting with an explanation. Then this subject is closed and any further contributions will be deleted. To clarify my own position:
I do not think it is wise or fair to post the contents of a pay site to a news group, even if a backdoor has been published.
Diallers are expensive, but perhaps BT gets a lot of the money (I\'m only guessing here). In any case people are entitled to be paid for their work and they are also entitled to express their opinion (moderately).
Several posts by krome have been irresponsible and deleted in the past. Some posts (like someone's into this thread just now) we delete because they make accusations which might be actionable.
Woodgnome tried to delete the thread from the bottom post up and insert an edited post in place of krome's, explaining why it had been deleted. He thought there was no point in leaving the other posts in place if you couldn't relate them to the original post. After sending the edit of kromes post, his isp connection crashed and when he managed to log back on, I had already intervened. His edit of krome's post hadn't appeared but mine had. The thread in response to krome went as follows (in edited form):
Author: Andrew Jones Date: 07-18-01 22:13
Well, how do I begin to reply to a flame post like that? Firstly Krome, \"smope\" posted his login details for everyone to see last friday in a.f.tvx. From this point onward, anybody reading a.f.tvx had the ability to access linda\'s website and access the pics, by posting them in a.f.tvx I just spared people the inconvenience of having to trawl through the site. Back to the website - they had been overcharging smope and I'm assuming he wanted revenge - surely some of your rage should be aimed at people who divulge the login info in the first place as this allows people unauthorized acccess to your work.
A lot of material posted in a.f.tvx is copyrighted-a lot of hotbox sets are posted and goldclub etc-why target me? Do I assume you have some link with linda leigh? Because I doubt shes running the site herself, [deletion]
I have no intention of posting any of your material [deletion].
If you have anymore to say, lets do this by email as this isn\'t the place for personal disputes.
Andrew
Author: An admirer Date: 07-19-01 00:11
Krome, strictly in my very humble opinion, while your galleries and information is much appreciated, your continued bawling and whinging really is doing you no favours. A dignified silence might be a more useful (and considerably less tiresome) option. Just a thought
[abusive post by tt not included]
Author: observer Date: 07-19-01 03:09
Why do you need so many free sites that cost you so much? Dialers are a pain in the arse and cost an arm and a leg to use...Membership is far better as the recurring rate is far better over a period of time... When people moan about you say your bit...when they moan about somebody else why but in? [objection to free sites not included]
Subject closed.
I do not think it is wise or fair to post the contents of a pay site to a news group, even if a backdoor has been published.
Diallers are expensive, but perhaps BT gets a lot of the money (I\'m only guessing here). In any case people are entitled to be paid for their work and they are also entitled to express their opinion (moderately).
Several posts by krome have been irresponsible and deleted in the past. Some posts (like someone's into this thread just now) we delete because they make accusations which might be actionable.
Woodgnome tried to delete the thread from the bottom post up and insert an edited post in place of krome's, explaining why it had been deleted. He thought there was no point in leaving the other posts in place if you couldn't relate them to the original post. After sending the edit of kromes post, his isp connection crashed and when he managed to log back on, I had already intervened. His edit of krome's post hadn't appeared but mine had. The thread in response to krome went as follows (in edited form):
Author: Andrew Jones Date: 07-18-01 22:13
Well, how do I begin to reply to a flame post like that? Firstly Krome, \"smope\" posted his login details for everyone to see last friday in a.f.tvx. From this point onward, anybody reading a.f.tvx had the ability to access linda\'s website and access the pics, by posting them in a.f.tvx I just spared people the inconvenience of having to trawl through the site. Back to the website - they had been overcharging smope and I'm assuming he wanted revenge - surely some of your rage should be aimed at people who divulge the login info in the first place as this allows people unauthorized acccess to your work.
A lot of material posted in a.f.tvx is copyrighted-a lot of hotbox sets are posted and goldclub etc-why target me? Do I assume you have some link with linda leigh? Because I doubt shes running the site herself, [deletion]
I have no intention of posting any of your material [deletion].
If you have anymore to say, lets do this by email as this isn\'t the place for personal disputes.
Andrew
Author: An admirer Date: 07-19-01 00:11
Krome, strictly in my very humble opinion, while your galleries and information is much appreciated, your continued bawling and whinging really is doing you no favours. A dignified silence might be a more useful (and considerably less tiresome) option. Just a thought
[abusive post by tt not included]
Author: observer Date: 07-19-01 03:09
Why do you need so many free sites that cost you so much? Dialers are a pain in the arse and cost an arm and a leg to use...Membership is far better as the recurring rate is far better over a period of time... When people moan about you say your bit...when they moan about somebody else why but in? [objection to free sites not included]
Subject closed.