UK Porn

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
JP
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

UK Porn

Post by JP »

Having had a subscription to Sex View TV for the last year and half I really cannot wait until the UK satellite channels have the right to show XXX movies. I appreciate it maybe a year or so along the line but I think it may be the saviour of the Brit Porn Industry, Imagine all the soft core versions of movies on TVX and TAC available hardcore, better than the current crop of USA movies I have to watch (albeit better than softcore UK porn). I hope it encourages producers in the UK to continually improve their movies and hope that a new breed of producer can emerge taking over from the current old guard whose movies have become tired and jaded. So for those who would like the same goal please bombard Ofcom with correspondence, otherwise the status quo will prevail, as for UK producers out there, let those with the strongest product prevail.

JP
Paul Tavener
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: UK Porn

Post by Paul Tavener »

Yes JP I agree. Ofcom's public consultation on standards is due this summer and everyone should be ready to send an email in support of broadcasting R18 content, although I suspect Ofcom will suggest it in their draft code anyway.

Further developments reguarding Ofcom, R18 and adult broadcasters will be posted on my website:

OFWATCH

If anyone wants to drop me a line I will email you when the consultation is announced: admin@ofwatch.org.uk

I also suspect there might be some further interesting developments well before the summer arrives...

contact [email]admin@ofwatch.org.uk[/email]
Pussy_eater
Posts: 298
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: UK Porn

Post by Pussy_eater »

Could that mean R18 censorship standards getting worser than they already are?
Paul Tavener
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: UK Porn

Post by Paul Tavener »

No I don't think so. Either Ofcom will allow the BBFC R18 classification on TV (likely) or they won'y (less likely). Ofcom and the BBFC are totaly different organisations and I think its very unlikely that the BBFC would back peddle now.

contact [email]admin@ofwatch.org.uk[/email]
David Lever
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: UK Porn

Post by David Lever »

Oh Schucks, I hate to think of myself as "Tired and jaded"!! LOL
JP
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: UK Porn

Post by JP »

Well lets face it David, you really are getting money for old rope if as you state on a previous thread that you've only ever shot soft core. Didn't have you in mind when I made the comments as to be honest I'd never heard of you or your shows until a few weeks ago as I've never had a subscription to TVX or TAC. I've never seen the point in paying ?10 per month when I can get XXX for the same amount with a euro satellite receiver.

When TVX goes hardcore (as it surely will) will you continue to shoot only softcore or will you change to shooting hardcore)

JP
David Lever
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: UK Porn

Post by David Lever »

Hi, By the way my postings on this site are not to discuss porn in general, they are to have comments on my shows from subscribers of TVX, So that I can perhaps add to my shows and improve the contents for the subscribers.

However just because porn is hardcore does not make it good, I'm sure there are many TVX viewers who are aware of the ease of receiving hardcore, but want a little more than seeing the same old oily steroid pumped studs shagging the same old silicon,dyed blonde, Euro/American(OHHH MY GARD, I'm CUMMINNNG!!!) Girls, with the moans and groans having to be dubbed on later, because they are bored shitless! I know 'cause I been involved in making tons of this shit in the past.
Many people watch TVX to be entertained as well as be turned on and for those it succeeds in areas that hardcore doesn't. If TVX wants hardcore then I'll make it. You might find it impossible to believe but there are many people out there who actually prefer watching softcore to hardcore.Regards David
artiste
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: UK Porn

Post by artiste »

I sort of agree, but guardedly.

Softcore CAN be highly sexy when done with imagination, and there are some good progs which can arouse even the most cynical. Well, perhaps not all.

Some HC is actually very offputtting - eg a stunning babe is employed, she is made to do a short strip, and then the next shot is of her with a giant dick in her mouth.....................(Usually US films)

What a waste of a beautiful girl.......she shoud have been given some erotic fore-play, which is to many, as sexy as fucking.

I still prefer to have the WHOLE experience, but Softcore does have its place, for the time being at least.

But go for erotic, anyone can fuck for goodness sake.................
JP
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: UK Porn

Post by JP »

Having thought about it I agree that if done properly it can probably be more erotic. I mean how many times have we seen a soft core film and visualised what it would have been like had we seen a harder version. And how many times have we been in the same position with xxx movies with the build up only to have been disappointed with final result.

So there you go David, make the same quality of movie but in hardcore keeping the eroticsm and visualisation of softcore, easy to man of your ability. I personally always liked porn from the late 70s early 80s which displayed these qualities more so than the current crop of movies.

JP
Officer Dibble
Posts: 2372
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: UK Porn

Post by Officer Dibble »

Spot on David. I was amazed recently when one of my esteemed colleagues said on the forum that he couldn't understand why some folks still preferred laidback erotic soft-core movies now that they could get their mitts on one of his 'get right down to it' heavy duty, bitch poking, asshole reaming, DPing, spunk splattering video extravaganzas. He just didn?t get it. He was so wrapped up in what he was doing that didn't get the fact that his movies had overstepped the erotic, gone beyond sex, and had become a numb, soulless, orgy of anonymous writhing flesh.

As in all good art, less is more. Why have so many forgotten the subtle tension building aspects of good erotica? - A glimpse of stocking top, a skirt blown up in the wind, a bountiful, well displayed cleavage, a coy, eyelash-fluttering demeanour. These are the little things that put us in the frame of mind for sex. Not the tedious orgy of banal self-indulgence that most contemporary producers of ?erotica? seem to be set on.

Regarding the ?skirt in the wind? thing. I did really see that once on a main road in Newark. I was just driving by as a gust of wind caught the skirt of a very well dressed, well groomed, prim ?n? proper looking lady. It blew her skirt right up ?Marilyn Monroe style ? and, as she fought to hold her skirt down and protect her modesty, I got a full eyeful of her lovely legs and curvaceous thighs, all beautifully clad in very classy, very naughty, black knickers, garter belt and stockings, It was a wonderful, almost magical, moment ? the kind of thing that would happen in a movie and although it was over twenty years ago the incident is still fresh in my mind today.

Anyhow, later that day, when I got home, I announced to my girlfriend that we would be stepping out that evening ?for a quick drink? knowing full well that it was my girlfriend?s custom to don black garter belt and stockings whenever we hit the town. Wheyhey!

Officer Dibble
Post Reply