Yes, what indeed does Cheryl [3] look like?

[Hugh Jampton]

I'm prepared to be criticised for this but can anyone explain the logic behind the "picture removed at model's request" thing?

I know that the board want to keep up good relations with the actresses who perform in adult films but I can't see the logic of denying access to images that are freely available elsewhere, least not on the covers of the DVD's and video's publicised on this site!

I have no desire to intrude on the privacy of others, I certainly wouldn't welcome papparazi shots of, "This is what XXX XXXXXX looks like thesedays" especially in the case of women who have retired from the adult industry, but I cannot fathom the logic that removes images that are easily available elsewhere.

[Bayleaf]

My view precisely. Who is the database for?

While I can understand a girl with a one-off performance in a deleted title might want anonimity' but a widely-published professional model? One that can be seen in current R18 productions? And have their own website?!!!

And what is even worse is the reclassification to confuse everyone, as Linda Murray is now Linda[2] and Linda Leigh is Linda[6]. Linda Murray is still on the books at Walpole and Beehive Studios. Pictures of Jan Burton can be found on her own website and currently on Voyeurweb.

I think the mods are being overly sensitive, a view shared by some models I have questioned on this very topic.