Yes, what indeed does Cheryl [3] look like?
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2004 6:09 pm
I'm prepared to be criticised for this but can anyone explain the logic behind the "picture removed at model's request" thing?
I know that the board want to keep up good relations with the actresses who perform in adult films but I can't see the logic of denying access to images that are freely available elsewhere, least not on the covers of the DVD's and video's publicised on this site!
I have no desire to intrude on the privacy of others, I certainly wouldn't welcome papparazi shots of, "This is what XXX XXXXXX looks like thesedays" especially in the case of women who have retired from the adult industry, but I cannot fathom the logic that removes images that are easily available elsewhere.
I know that the board want to keep up good relations with the actresses who perform in adult films but I can't see the logic of denying access to images that are freely available elsewhere, least not on the covers of the DVD's and video's publicised on this site!
I have no desire to intrude on the privacy of others, I certainly wouldn't welcome papparazi shots of, "This is what XXX XXXXXX looks like thesedays" especially in the case of women who have retired from the adult industry, but I cannot fathom the logic that removes images that are easily available elsewhere.