Coutts is innocent!!!!

[Jacques]

From backlash:

Lord Hutton's judgment points out that Coutts had engaged in breath play sexual games with previous partners years before he started to use internet porn. The Judge commented that if the same Defendant guilty of the same conduct been tried before the same jury, but without the evidence that he used internet porn, the jury would have been very likely to accept that he did not intend to kill.

It is hard to escape the conclusion that the Judge thought the evidence that Coutts used porn prejudiced the jury and led to unfounded assumptions about Coutt's intent.



So what are the Government going on about then with their prejudiced assumptions of Liz Longhursts view on Violent Pornography? And secondly does this stance by the Government prejudice the re-trial? And what happens if he is acquitted, where does this leave the Violent Porn Bill?

[planeterotica]

I think i may have beat you to this one Jaques,