Note the impartial (cough, cough) title of the UOD debate. Porn is found guilty even before the debate takes place.
Rob Stone turns down invite.
Re: Rob Stone turns down invite.
warren zevon rip wrote:
> Trumpton wrote:
>
> > Note the impartial (cough, cough) title of the UOD debate.
> > Porn is found guilty even before the debate takes place.
>
> Thank you breaking my thread's duck.
You're velcom Von Wazzakins.
> Trumpton wrote:
>
> > Note the impartial (cough, cough) title of the UOD debate.
> > Porn is found guilty even before the debate takes place.
>
> Thank you breaking my thread's duck.
You're velcom Von Wazzakins.
Re: Rob Stone turns down invite.
Just reading **********'s news pages. I like his style- he takes no prisoners and no crap. Just like me.
Not that keen on the content of some of his films- but I defend what he is doing. As long as the usual limits are observed- if he has a market for folk who want to watch 'menstrual fluid' been sucked, then good for him.
Not that keen on the content of some of his films- but I defend what he is doing. As long as the usual limits are observed- if he has a market for folk who want to watch 'menstrual fluid' been sucked, then good for him.
Re: Rob Stone turns down invite.
Keith is? An ordinary punter like you and I?
Re: Rob Stone turns down invite.
colonel wrote:
> Just reading **********'s news pages. I like his style- he takes
> no prisoners and no crap. Just like me.
And me.
> Not that keen on the content of some of his films- but I defend
> what he is doing.
I throuoghly enjoy the films of his I've got. I'll defend what he is doing/has done as well.
> As long as the usual limits are observed- if
> he has a market for folk who want to watch 'menstrual fluid'
> been sucked, then good for him.
The 'menstrual fluid' sucking is a tad OTT for me - but the participants are adults then good for them.
> Just reading **********'s news pages. I like his style- he takes
> no prisoners and no crap. Just like me.
And me.
> Not that keen on the content of some of his films- but I defend
> what he is doing.
I throuoghly enjoy the films of his I've got. I'll defend what he is doing/has done as well.
> As long as the usual limits are observed- if
> he has a market for folk who want to watch 'menstrual fluid'
> been sucked, then good for him.
The 'menstrual fluid' sucking is a tad OTT for me - but the participants are adults then good for them.