websites are no different to films
A lot are just filler,uncreative low quality non-exclusive dross
If you do your research right you can usually bystep the majority of them
I've been burned enough times to read the signs
Rule number 1...never assume anything said on a website tour is true
unless samples are provided...seeing is believing
Porn Sites Hack Me Off
Re: Porn Sites Hack Me Off
Mug's game. Why pay?
There's more than enough free (or virtually free) quality porn on the Web if you know where to look.
I've subscribed to a couple of pay sites in my time - but not any more. And the thing that puts me off with the vast majority of them is the automatic rebilling "for your convenience".
It's not for the punter's convenience at all - it's relying on the punter to either (a) forget to cancel his subscription or (b) not being arsed to do same.
That's not to say that they're all bad. But the vast majority are (in my opinion) way overpriced and not updated regularly enough to justify an ongoing membership. Plus (as mentioned in the post above) in some cases a lot of the content is sub-standard "filler".
So often I've seen sites where I've thought to myself '10 Dollars / Euros for a month with non-recurring membership and a I might give it a punt - but at 29.99 with rebilling, they can keep it'.
Would be interesting to hear the counter-views of the porn site operators who stalk these forums.
- Eric
There's more than enough free (or virtually free) quality porn on the Web if you know where to look.
I've subscribed to a couple of pay sites in my time - but not any more. And the thing that puts me off with the vast majority of them is the automatic rebilling "for your convenience".
It's not for the punter's convenience at all - it's relying on the punter to either (a) forget to cancel his subscription or (b) not being arsed to do same.
That's not to say that they're all bad. But the vast majority are (in my opinion) way overpriced and not updated regularly enough to justify an ongoing membership. Plus (as mentioned in the post above) in some cases a lot of the content is sub-standard "filler".
So often I've seen sites where I've thought to myself '10 Dollars / Euros for a month with non-recurring membership and a I might give it a punt - but at 29.99 with rebilling, they can keep it'.
Would be interesting to hear the counter-views of the porn site operators who stalk these forums.
- Eric
-
one eyed jack
- Posts: 12413
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Porn Sites Hack Me Off
Here I am folks. I've got several sites. As far as I can tell we do a pretty good job with vlaue for money and regualr updates and I defy any of you to complain about lack of content.
As for whether you like my stuff or not is a different matter entirely but I do try. Honest.
I've seen the compression quality of my downloads and must say i think its is damn bloody good.
But I can only speak for my sites mind. My advice is to check out the reviews. My only beef with reviewers is that they sometimes just dont get it with the real couples thing when they make comments about looks as if every couple should look like stunning porn stars. (what part of real do they not understand?)
Recurring billing? Well all sites that use this state it and I'd like to think we offer a good service should you wish to pull out then you may do so without any problems. I know we dont do it with the hope you forget about it.
I speak for my own sites and not for those that hack you off and think the equivalent of ?15 a month is not exorbitant given that I spend a pretty penny or two on the shoots every month
As for whether you like my stuff or not is a different matter entirely but I do try. Honest.
I've seen the compression quality of my downloads and must say i think its is damn bloody good.
But I can only speak for my sites mind. My advice is to check out the reviews. My only beef with reviewers is that they sometimes just dont get it with the real couples thing when they make comments about looks as if every couple should look like stunning porn stars. (what part of real do they not understand?)
Recurring billing? Well all sites that use this state it and I'd like to think we offer a good service should you wish to pull out then you may do so without any problems. I know we dont do it with the hope you forget about it.
I speak for my own sites and not for those that hack you off and think the equivalent of ?15 a month is not exorbitant given that I spend a pretty penny or two on the shoots every month
www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
-
planeterotica
- Posts: 7093
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Porn Sites Hack Me Off
Flat_Eric wrote:
> Mug's game. Why pay?
>
> There's more than enough free (or virtually free) quality porn
> on the Web if you know where to look.
>
> I've subscribed to a couple of pay sites in my time - but not
> any more. And the thing that puts me off with the vast majority
> of them is the automatic rebilling "for your convenience".
>
> It's not for the punter's convenience at all - it's relying on
> the punter to either (a) forget to cancel his subscription or
> (b) not being arsed to do same.
>
> That's not to say that they're all bad. But the vast majority
> are (in my opinion) way overpriced and not updated regularly
> enough to justify an ongoing membership. Plus (as mentioned in
> the post above) in some cases a lot of the content is
> sub-standard "filler".
>
> So often I've seen sites where I've thought to myself '10
> Dollars / Euros for a month with non-recurring membership and a
> I might give it a punt - but at 29.99 with rebilling, they can
> keep it'.
>
> Would be interesting to hear the counter-views of the porn site
> operators who stalk these forums.
>
> - Eric
>
planeterotica wrote:
You old skinflint if you want a couple of days cheap wanking try this for less tha $3.00
!shocked!!love!!shocked!
> Mug's game. Why pay?
>
> There's more than enough free (or virtually free) quality porn
> on the Web if you know where to look.
>
> I've subscribed to a couple of pay sites in my time - but not
> any more. And the thing that puts me off with the vast majority
> of them is the automatic rebilling "for your convenience".
>
> It's not for the punter's convenience at all - it's relying on
> the punter to either (a) forget to cancel his subscription or
> (b) not being arsed to do same.
>
> That's not to say that they're all bad. But the vast majority
> are (in my opinion) way overpriced and not updated regularly
> enough to justify an ongoing membership. Plus (as mentioned in
> the post above) in some cases a lot of the content is
> sub-standard "filler".
>
> So often I've seen sites where I've thought to myself '10
> Dollars / Euros for a month with non-recurring membership and a
> I might give it a punt - but at 29.99 with rebilling, they can
> keep it'.
>
> Would be interesting to hear the counter-views of the porn site
> operators who stalk these forums.
>
> - Eric
>
planeterotica wrote:
You old skinflint if you want a couple of days cheap wanking try this for less tha $3.00
!shocked!!love!!shocked!
-
one eyed jack
- Posts: 12413
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Porn Sites Hack Me Off
Looking at that site I can see now why people think Real Couples is not ..well real. The obvious sign is the girls all have a generic young look to them instead of the random quality you find with "real next door girlfriends"
I guess its the fantasy of it that people subscribe to which works well. Nice site anyhow.
I guess its the fantasy of it that people subscribe to which works well. Nice site anyhow.
www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
-
planeterotica
- Posts: 7093
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Porn Sites Hack Me Off
planeterotica wrote:
> Flat_Eric wrote:
>
> > Mug's game. Why pay?
> >
> > There's more than enough free (or virtually free) quality
> porn
> > on the Web if you know where to look.
> >
> > I've subscribed to a couple of pay sites in my time - but not
> > any more. And the thing that puts me off with the vast
> majority
> > of them is the automatic rebilling "for your convenience".
> >
> > It's not for the punter's convenience at all - it's relying
> on
> > the punter to either (a) forget to cancel his subscription or
> > (b) not being arsed to do same.
> >
> > That's not to say that they're all bad. But the vast majority
> > are (in my opinion) way overpriced and not updated regularly
> > enough to justify an ongoing membership. Plus (as mentioned
> in
> > the post above) in some cases a lot of the content is
> > sub-standard "filler".
> >
> > So often I've seen sites where I've thought to myself '10
> > Dollars / Euros for a month with non-recurring membership and
> a
> > I might give it a punt - but at 29.99 with rebilling, they
> can
> > keep it'.
> >
> > Would be interesting to hear the counter-views of the porn
> site
> > operators who stalk these forums.
> >
> > - Eric
> >
> planeterotica wrote:
>
> You old skinflint if you want a couple of days cheap wanking
> try this for less tha $3.00
>
> !shocked!!love!!shocked!
>
>
>
Sorry here is the skinflint link
> Flat_Eric wrote:
>
> > Mug's game. Why pay?
> >
> > There's more than enough free (or virtually free) quality
> porn
> > on the Web if you know where to look.
> >
> > I've subscribed to a couple of pay sites in my time - but not
> > any more. And the thing that puts me off with the vast
> majority
> > of them is the automatic rebilling "for your convenience".
> >
> > It's not for the punter's convenience at all - it's relying
> on
> > the punter to either (a) forget to cancel his subscription or
> > (b) not being arsed to do same.
> >
> > That's not to say that they're all bad. But the vast majority
> > are (in my opinion) way overpriced and not updated regularly
> > enough to justify an ongoing membership. Plus (as mentioned
> in
> > the post above) in some cases a lot of the content is
> > sub-standard "filler".
> >
> > So often I've seen sites where I've thought to myself '10
> > Dollars / Euros for a month with non-recurring membership and
> a
> > I might give it a punt - but at 29.99 with rebilling, they
> can
> > keep it'.
> >
> > Would be interesting to hear the counter-views of the porn
> site
> > operators who stalk these forums.
> >
> > - Eric
> >
> planeterotica wrote:
>
> You old skinflint if you want a couple of days cheap wanking
> try this for less tha $3.00
>
> !shocked!!love!!shocked!
>
>
>
Sorry here is the skinflint link
-
planeterotica
- Posts: 7093
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Porn Sites Hack Me Off
one eyed jack wrote:
> Looking at that site I can see now why people think Real
> Couples is not ..well real. The obvious sign is the girls all
> have a generic young look to them instead of the random
> quality you find with "real next door girlfriends"
>
> I guess its the fantasy of it that people subscribe to which
> works well. Nice site anyhow.
>
planeterotica wrote:
Actually Terry yours is by far the best site in my opinion but times are hard for a lot of people, so maybe pile it high and sell it cheap is the way to go, thats the way Slipper Jack who started Tescos survived in hard times !thumbsup!
> Looking at that site I can see now why people think Real
> Couples is not ..well real. The obvious sign is the girls all
> have a generic young look to them instead of the random
> quality you find with "real next door girlfriends"
>
> I guess its the fantasy of it that people subscribe to which
> works well. Nice site anyhow.
>
planeterotica wrote:
Actually Terry yours is by far the best site in my opinion but times are hard for a lot of people, so maybe pile it high and sell it cheap is the way to go, thats the way Slipper Jack who started Tescos survived in hard times !thumbsup!