Police and anti terrorism
-
JonnyHungwell
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Police and anti terrorism
Why do they keep arresting people, claim they're going to blow up buses, shopping centres, football grounds etc. etc. etc. ---- then they always release them a couple of weeks later with NO CHARGES? You'd have to conclude that the police are shite at their job, but that's par for the course in a shite country.
Re: Police and anti terrorism
On the other hand maybe there is enough evidence to SUSPECT that they may be up no good, but not enough evidence to actually go to a court a PROVE that they are up to no good.
Some of these things are VERY hard to prove, and it can takes months of work, and cost millions of pounds, to bring as case to trial, and it may fail on some technicality.
Surely it is enough for the police to distrupt their cell, and get most of them out the country, BEFORE they actually blow up a shopping centre.
We had an append on here a week or so back headed "How do gangsters get away with it" about people who live in huge houses yet have no visibile means of support. How do you PROVE they are getting their money illegally.
Unless you catch someone in the act of actually blowing up a bus or train these things are very hard to prove.
As far as I am concerned, if there is an ounce of suspicion, get them out the country.
Some of these things are VERY hard to prove, and it can takes months of work, and cost millions of pounds, to bring as case to trial, and it may fail on some technicality.
Surely it is enough for the police to distrupt their cell, and get most of them out the country, BEFORE they actually blow up a shopping centre.
We had an append on here a week or so back headed "How do gangsters get away with it" about people who live in huge houses yet have no visibile means of support. How do you PROVE they are getting their money illegally.
Unless you catch someone in the act of actually blowing up a bus or train these things are very hard to prove.
As far as I am concerned, if there is an ounce of suspicion, get them out the country.
Re: Police and anti terrorism
>You'd have to conclude that the police are shite at their job, but that's
>par for the course in a shite country.
And if you are going to get annoyed at anyone, dont get annoyed with the police, get annoyed with the scum who are happy to come here, live on benefits, then have the nerve to blow people up on buses and trains.
>par for the course in a shite country.
And if you are going to get annoyed at anyone, dont get annoyed with the police, get annoyed with the scum who are happy to come here, live on benefits, then have the nerve to blow people up on buses and trains.
Re: Police and anti terrorism
>are innocent it barely warrents a mention.
There is a big difference between "innocent" and "not enough strong evidence to convict you".
Just because they have not been taken to court does not mean they are "innocent"
There is a big difference between "innocent" and "not enough strong evidence to convict you".
Just because they have not been taken to court does not mean they are "innocent"
Re: Police and anti terrorism
swampthing wrote:
>when these 'terrorists' are innocent it barely warrents a
> mention.
You having a giggle swampthing?
The media can't wait to put the knife in. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a section of the BBC, in particular, who actually sit with fingers crossed hoping that they get off, so they can do the how did you feel story, followed by the internet / email debate on how the viewers feel.
>when these 'terrorists' are innocent it barely warrents a
> mention.
You having a giggle swampthing?
The media can't wait to put the knife in. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a section of the BBC, in particular, who actually sit with fingers crossed hoping that they get off, so they can do the how did you feel story, followed by the internet / email debate on how the viewers feel.