Winston Churchill.

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Locked
max_tranmere
Posts: 4734
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Winston Churchill.

Post by max_tranmere »

As Nick Griffin has dominated the news for the last few days people have questioned whether Griffin's recent assertion that Churchill would have been kicked out of the Tory party if he was alive today, and that the BNP are the only outfit who would have him, is something that has got me intrigued. I do think anyone who was that against the European union being a superstate and anyone with such an anti immigrant view as the view Churchill held, who be banned from joining any of the main three parties - and if they were already in one they would be kicked out. But then so many politicans are only interested in furthering their miserable careers that they often compromise their principles in order to advance themselves - maybe Churchill would have done that, who knows?
Sarah Kelly
Posts: 2879
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Winston Churchill.

Post by Sarah Kelly »

I like to think that was a time ,i dont know when....(maybe with the Romans......er,maybe not..) when politicians actually had integrity and more than self interest at heart.... I do know that none of the current sorry lot of incumbants would be fit enough to even draw the same breathe as Churchill....No doubt he had many faults, but if it wasnt for him we"d already be in a European Superstate..and not a very nice one at that.......

Always certed,works to Hard BG/GG/ANAL/DP+EXTREME Fetish.
Easy going,fun,Hard Working,Professional
I turn up prepared,on time,ready to shoot what you want as I`m RELIABLE! ;)

SarahKellyxxx
Lizard
Posts: 6228
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Winston Churchill.

Post by Lizard »

Your F.A.Q, d.

[_]> No Liberals were harmed during the making of this post.
Sam Slater
Posts: 11624
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Winston Churchill.

Post by Sam Slater »

You know, when you make a post calling Mel B a wog, and the mods remove it, it's not the best idea to carry on.

At least I know where I stand with you, though, unlike some on here who spend a little more time and effort hiding their hate and prejudices.

[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
max_tranmere
Posts: 4734
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Winston Churchill.

Post by max_tranmere »

Sam, this is odd: so calling people 'pakis' and 'wogs' (I think that is the first time I've ever typed those words) is admirable because other people, who you think want to do it but don't, don't?
Sam Slater
Posts: 11624
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Winston Churchill.

Post by Sam Slater »

Facetiousness with a little sarcasm, Max. Mind you, if he gets banned for his constant racist remarks then it's one less to deal with, so in a way there's elements of truth to what I said.

It's not surprising you're more inclined to reply to my remark rather than condemn Shiraz's bile. You keep telling us you're not racist and not a BNP supporter but spend a hell of a lot of your bgafd time defending them and ignoring racist remarks such as this.

[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Locked