Page 1 of 1

Re: Winston Churchill.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:33 pm
by max_tranmere
As Nick Griffin has dominated the news for the last few days people have questioned whether Griffin's recent assertion that Churchill would have been kicked out of the Tory party if he was alive today, and that the BNP are the only outfit who would have him, is something that has got me intrigued. I do think anyone who was that against the European union being a superstate and anyone with such an anti immigrant view as the view Churchill held, who be banned from joining any of the main three parties - and if they were already in one they would be kicked out. But then so many politicans are only interested in furthering their miserable careers that they often compromise their principles in order to advance themselves - maybe Churchill would have done that, who knows?

Re: Winston Churchill.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 5:59 pm
by Sarah Kelly
I like to think that was a time ,i dont know when....(maybe with the Romans......er,maybe not..) when politicians actually had integrity and more than self interest at heart.... I do know that none of the current sorry lot of incumbants would be fit enough to even draw the same breathe as Churchill....No doubt he had many faults, but if it wasnt for him we"d already be in a European Superstate..and not a very nice one at that.......


Re: Winston Churchill.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:09 pm
by Lizard
Your F.A.Q, d.


Re: Winston Churchill.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:22 pm
by Sam Slater
You know, when you make a post calling Mel B a wog, and the mods remove it, it's not the best idea to carry on.

At least I know where I stand with you, though, unlike some on here who spend a little more time and effort hiding their hate and prejudices.


Re: Winston Churchill.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:25 pm
by max_tranmere
Sam, this is odd: so calling people 'pakis' and 'wogs' (I think that is the first time I've ever typed those words) is admirable because other people, who you think want to do it but don't, don't?

Re: Winston Churchill.

Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:31 pm
by Sam Slater
Facetiousness with a little sarcasm, Max. Mind you, if he gets banned for his constant racist remarks then it's one less to deal with, so in a way there's elements of truth to what I said.

It's not surprising you're more inclined to reply to my remark rather than condemn Shiraz's bile. You keep telling us you're not racist and not a BNP supporter but spend a hell of a lot of your bgafd time defending them and ignoring racist remarks such as this.