Actresses with no pics - rules for supplying one?

[dbm7]

Hello folks,

was cruising around the nice index and was wondering whether it'd be possible to contribute pix for gals with missing photos...those would be Screenies from movies that I have rather than stuff from Photoshoots, like it seems to be the general procedure.

So would that be possible? I'm thinking for instance for Ayla Mia, a chick a favor that has not much info on her egafd-site.

But what would be the rules would be also a question..from what I see I'm thinking: penetration is a sure no go, but face with a breast here and there, general upper body, tattoos..something like that. !cool!

anyone got an idea how that goes or who'd I have to write to?
I checked the FAQ 'n stuff but didn't really find much that covers this topic

Greets
dbm7

[jj]

You're almost there on the style of pics required- obviously what is ideally
wanted is a headshot, more or less; additional shots should illustrate where
possible physical peculiarities such as moles/tattoos/scars- with the latter it's
almost inevitable that these can only be obtained by capping the girl during
sex. Alec will crop/edit them to suit, where possible. Try to give the mods a
choice, say about a dozen good-quality caps.

Either post them here with a few notes on the film [have a trawl through
a few of the write-ups here to see what sort of styles the various
contributors adopt], or mail the pics with a note to info@egafd.com.
There's also some useful advice in a thread below on Aspect Ratios, which
you may find useful.

[dbm7]

thanks for the detailed infos, man!

[jj]

[img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/thumbsup.gif[/img]

[alec]

Thanks in advance.

The only thing I would add to what jj has said is that the captures should be from a film either that we list or that we would list if we knew about it. We don't list American titles, Private titles, or titles made by European directors for American companies (Evil Angel being a good example) unless we can add alternative European titles. This is to reduce the workload - it is pointless to duplicate what is already on iafd at the expense of covering titles which are not on iafd.

That's an attempt to cover the general principles on which we operate, but I'm sure people will find exceptions among what we have already listed. It's increasingly difficult to draw a distinction between European and American titles, but we have to try because it is simply impossible to cover everything. Sometimes we just have to make fairly arbitrary decisions.

Thanks again, but there's no hurry. We are way behind as it is with adding information that's been posted or sent by e-mail. Apologies to all those affected.

[madiba159]

Sounds like a load of red tape. Why not just add a photo for the sake of identifying the girls for the time being, whether its a Private pic or whatever. You can then always substitute it with one later that 'conforms' the the rules.

Now you may end up with IE an actress without an ID because the VIPs of EGAFD say its in CMYK rather than RGB. LOL.

[alec]

Because the owners of the rights are less likely to object on copyright grounds if we are advertising their film by listing it.

[marcel_43]

I just found a picture of Ayla Mia and saw that there is yet no headshot.

[IMG]http://img260.imagevenue.com/loc349/th_45049_am_123_349lo.jpg[/IMG]

This one is taken from . Alec has to decide if it can be added to her page since it is not from one of her movies.

[Len801]

I do not recall specifically in this forum, by in IAFD and EBI, I believe there may be rare occasions where (due to lack of any better pic of the performer) cropped portion of video box cover was used.
So a precedent has been made to use a pic not taken directly from the movie itself.
Since it seems the pic already carries a copyright notice, then Alec might be able to use it and leave the copyright inscription there or show it on her profile page.
Just my two cents.

[Bad Samaritan]

Don't worry. I already sent some nice caps of Ayla Mia.