I found this photoset on my computer. It's part of a photoshoot that was floating on the internet maybe ten years ago.
[IMG]http://thumbnails8.imagebam.com/3149/3d22db31483550.gif[/IMG]
[IMG]http://thumbnails9.imagebam.com/3149/19300e31483553.gif[/IMG]
[IMG]http://thumbnails14.imagebam.com/3149/8e4bba31483554.gif[/IMG]
[IMG]http://thumbnails16.imagebam.com/3149/3a523831483556.gif[/IMG]
(click for larger pictures)
Who were these ladies? Is it part from a movie?
Thanks in advance!
Two girls to ID
Re: Two girls to ID
The girl in the black stockings is Vivian [5].
The bald girl might be Mercedes [4]; if not she's at least familiar.
This is probably a Private photoshoot- I can't recall a video scene
featuring both these girls.
The bald girl might be Mercedes [4]; if not she's at least familiar.
This is probably a Private photoshoot- I can't recall a video scene
featuring both these girls.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
chiavatorcortese
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Two girls to ID
Other pictures from the same set here
The site confirms that it's a Private set.
By the way, I recall this deserted post, hoping for some answer.
The site confirms that it's a Private set.
By the way, I recall this deserted post, hoping for some answer.
Re: Two girls to ID
Thanks- I'm fairly confident now it's Mercs [4]- you can see
that distinctive blemish on the left side of her nose.
that distinctive blemish on the left side of her nose.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
chiavatorcortese
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Two girls to ID
I accept your ID for Mercedes because of the penultimate pic in egafd. But where do you see the blemish in the Groupseries set? Just in picture n 17 (on the right side, but many of the pictures are reverted); is it enough? Do you know if the girl did some (good) tit job after B?se Madchen? In our set they look very better than in the egafd picture from that film
Re: Two girls to ID
After one's viewed a good few scenes of a given girl one gets
a 'vibe' if one sees her in another title. It's part of the same
experimentally-studied cognitive process that enables people to
identify friends and family-members from photographs taken at very
unusual angles or in poor lighting conditions, or from only the
most fleeting glimpses. The brain stores minute visual cues that
taken individually are meaningless, but when mnemonically-assembled
make a coherent 'print'.
Other people might prefer to call this intuition- or experience,
if you prefer.
Well.... you DID ask : -))
a 'vibe' if one sees her in another title. It's part of the same
experimentally-studied cognitive process that enables people to
identify friends and family-members from photographs taken at very
unusual angles or in poor lighting conditions, or from only the
most fleeting glimpses. The brain stores minute visual cues that
taken individually are meaningless, but when mnemonically-assembled
make a coherent 'print'.
Other people might prefer to call this intuition- or experience,
if you prefer.
Well.... you DID ask : -))
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
chiavatorcortese
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Two girls to ID
No, no, I prefer to call it mnemonical assemblation !happy! and I think that's what you have very strong and I have very weak. And I think that, guided by it, you can do good use of picture 17.
But what do you think about her tits?
But what do you think about her tits?
Re: Two girls to ID
chiavatorcortese wrote:
> No, no, I prefer to call it mnemonical assemblation
Nothing like calling a spade a manually-operated earth-inverting
implement : -))
> I think that's what you have very strong and I have very weak.
It doesn't work in a consistent fashion for anyone, I think- often
someone will see an ID where all I see is confusion.
> And I think that, guided by it, you can do good use of picture
> 17.
That's the most convincing pic of the lot- as you say. it seems to
have been reversed:
[IMG]http://www.egafd.com/images/hosted/56i4yspalb08fhcmukyk_thumb.jpg[/IMG].
> But what do you think about her tits?
She has lovely tits : -) I agree, they look a litle small in some of
these caps but all the other features trump this. This one's better:
[IMG]http://www.egafd.com/images/hosted/zuc3zch6qgy9j4l6wwfs_thumb.jpg[/IMG].
> No, no, I prefer to call it mnemonical assemblation
Nothing like calling a spade a manually-operated earth-inverting
implement : -))
> I think that's what you have very strong and I have very weak.
It doesn't work in a consistent fashion for anyone, I think- often
someone will see an ID where all I see is confusion.
> And I think that, guided by it, you can do good use of picture
> 17.
That's the most convincing pic of the lot- as you say. it seems to
have been reversed:
[IMG]http://www.egafd.com/images/hosted/56i4yspalb08fhcmukyk_thumb.jpg[/IMG].
> But what do you think about her tits?
She has lovely tits : -) I agree, they look a litle small in some of
these caps but all the other features trump this. This one's better:
[IMG]http://www.egafd.com/images/hosted/zuc3zch6qgy9j4l6wwfs_thumb.jpg[/IMG].
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."