Could the reference in FAQ3.10 to imageshack be removed?
It seems a little rum for an adult site to refer to an image-host which routinely
deletes anything remotely 'naughty'; and its removal would avoid putting ideas
into FAQ-reading newbies' heads, thereby saving some poor sod [often me] having
to 'rescue' pics from IS before they vanish.
One for Phil?
One for Phil?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."