Der Brief

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of Continental European female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Post Reply
deezer
Posts: 4063
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Der Brief

Post by deezer »

Studio (cover): SMALLTALK-VIDEO VHS: HV80233
Studio (end credits): SMALLTALK Film
Length: appr. 60 min (cover); appr. 60 min (copy viewed)
Director (cover, end credits): twawer
Direct German sound
Year: not given, but I estimate 2003/2004

I don't know when exactly Lulu Perez acquired the tattoo of a devil on pubes.
She doesn't have it in Uromania 14, but in Uromania 15.
And in the SMalltalk-films her last appearance without this tattoo is H?rte 10 (HV 80226).
Her first appearance with the tattoo is in Zucht & Ordnung 2 (HV 80228) also here in this film (HV 802233).
So maybe this could be a reference point for the year of production.



Cast/Credits:

Lulu Perez as/plays Sklavin Anna (end credits); as/plays Anna (back-cover text)
Lady Nicole as/plays Mistress Nicole (end credits); as/plays Mistress Nico (back-cover text)

Big Daddy as/plays Sklave Olaf (end credits)

===========================================================================

Spanking, whipping, hot wax and clothespegs for Lulu Perez and Big Daddy.
CBT for Big Daddy
BJ, vag, facial for Lulu Perez.
===========================================================================

Cover (VHS), screencaps

ImageImage

On screen title, end credits

ImageImage

Lulu Perez (Tattoo) (not db-friendly)

Image
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Der Brief

Post by jj »

Thanks.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
deezer
Posts: 4063
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Der Brief

Post by deezer »

Thanks for your effort.

Do you have any idea, when Lulu acquired her tattoo?

This would help for estimating the year of the following films of the monster.
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Der Brief

Post by jj »

I read your reasoning and couldn't disagree.
You may take read that ambiguity in any way you wish : -)

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Post Reply