XNK3282 = Kim de Place ?

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of Continental European female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Post Reply
deezer
Posts: 4063
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

XNK3282 = Kim de Place ?

Post by deezer »

I didn't see Springtime and found only this screens and cover, but from
her gallery, I would say xnk3282 is the same person as Kim de Place.

Some doubt remaining, because of the mole at the chin of xnk,
which can't be seen in Kim's gallery. And I can't remember, that I saw this
mole in scenes of Kim de Place.


Image
Image
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNK3282 = Kim de Place ?

Post by jj »

I'm inclined to agree... however:
3282 has a distinctive mole on her chin and an open heart-tattoo on her
upper left arm:
ImageImageImage.

I've checked Unfallstation and can see neither. Both might be obscured
by make-up and the tat merely a transfer. I've tried to see some of the
later stuff attributed to her but (for ex.) the relevant VEF thread is
essentially dead.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
deezer
Posts: 4063
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNK3282 = Kim de Place ?

Post by deezer »

jj wrote:

> I'm inclined to agree... however:
> 3282 has a distinctive mole on her chin and an open
> heart-tattoo on her
> upper left arm:
> ImageImageImage.
>
> I've checked Unfallstation and can see neither. Both might be
> obscured
> by make-up and the tat merely a transfer. I've tried to see
> some of the
> later stuff attributed to her but (for ex.) the relevant VEF
> thread is
> essentially dead.
>


Thanks a lot for digging out your copy to make the caps.
Could Springtime be produced later then Unfallstation?
That would make sense for the tattoo.

I made some shots from the stream of a clip which I have linked here.
I got only a glimpse of the tat, but it is there!

Image Image Image

Remains the mole. Could it be a scab? Maybe she cut herself shaving. !grin!
I have looked now again at some more recent scenes, and there is nowhere a
mole to see. And that aren't most times high budget films, so the possibility
that the mole is overdone with make-up, is extremley slight.
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNK3282 = Kim de Place ?

Post by jj »

From Unfallstation, again:
Image.

QED : -)
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNK3282 = Kim de Place ?

Post by jj »

Ah, ignore me.
'Senior moment'.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: XNK3282 = Kim de Place ?

Post by jj »

No; I was right in the first place. Senility.

I showed the tat in 3282, above; and now I've seen it in KdP.
QED.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
alec
Posts: 9874
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 1:22 pm

Re: XNK3282 = Kim de Place ?

Post by alec »

Merged.
Post Reply