sex-education V's porn show
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:35 am
I watched that sex-education V's porn show last night... my hopes weren't high and they were well satisfied by some of the crap spouted.
Did you see this?
Basically anything that has empowered middle-class women... sex-toys - high street sex shops owned by women - the proliferation of sexy lingerie - pills & potions for women... all great, healthy and good. Anything that has anything to do with porn is bad, unhealthy, untrue, devoid of any virtue... etc... blah... Even the male 'pornstar' they wheeled-out was a cunt to us all. Hope nobody ever hires the bastard again!
The presenter asked a load of boys what they thought about shaving pubic hair - some said yes, some no and one said he thinks that men who shave the lot look okay. She responded by saying that this was proof that porn had warped his idea of pubic hair!!! for fuck's sake!
Does Clairol warp her idea of women going grey naturally??? It's just a fucking fashion choice for crying out loud!
Even ejaculation was hijacked. Asked how much volume a man should cum they all (boys) got it wrong by overstating their estimates.
Apparently this is the fault of porn telling us that we must all cum loads because obviously all these boys watch porn. But no boy was asked whether or not his estimate was based on how much HE actually produces! Don't boys masturbate? Don't they have some idea about it from their own experience? The presenter congratulated herself on how she had now re-educated the boys and set their fears of inadequacy to rest... but what about the boy who may well produce a lot of ejaculate?... he'll be well concerned now won't he?
And don't even get me started on the 'line-up' of male models they used to show us what 'normal' men look like naked because there was one guy who actually looked like a porn-star type. Big, muscular, well-sized cock AND black. The camera continually panned across the line-up
but always stopped just as it got to him. This became more and more noticeable as the program went on... I'll say no more.
Except... bastards as usual
Did you see this?
Basically anything that has empowered middle-class women... sex-toys - high street sex shops owned by women - the proliferation of sexy lingerie - pills & potions for women... all great, healthy and good. Anything that has anything to do with porn is bad, unhealthy, untrue, devoid of any virtue... etc... blah... Even the male 'pornstar' they wheeled-out was a cunt to us all. Hope nobody ever hires the bastard again!
The presenter asked a load of boys what they thought about shaving pubic hair - some said yes, some no and one said he thinks that men who shave the lot look okay. She responded by saying that this was proof that porn had warped his idea of pubic hair!!! for fuck's sake!
Does Clairol warp her idea of women going grey naturally??? It's just a fucking fashion choice for crying out loud!
Even ejaculation was hijacked. Asked how much volume a man should cum they all (boys) got it wrong by overstating their estimates.
Apparently this is the fault of porn telling us that we must all cum loads because obviously all these boys watch porn. But no boy was asked whether or not his estimate was based on how much HE actually produces! Don't boys masturbate? Don't they have some idea about it from their own experience? The presenter congratulated herself on how she had now re-educated the boys and set their fears of inadequacy to rest... but what about the boy who may well produce a lot of ejaculate?... he'll be well concerned now won't he?
And don't even get me started on the 'line-up' of male models they used to show us what 'normal' men look like naked because there was one guy who actually looked like a porn-star type. Big, muscular, well-sized cock AND black. The camera continually panned across the line-up
but always stopped just as it got to him. This became more and more noticeable as the program went on... I'll say no more.
Except... bastards as usual