Good or bad?
habeas corpus
Re: habeas corpus
Absolutely, fundamentally good.
Which is why of course the govt. and police want to abolish it, at least
as far as they think they can get away with it.
Which is why of course the govt. and police want to abolish it, at least
as far as they think they can get away with it.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: habeas corpus
the play?Trumpton wrote:
> Good or bad?
>
>
> Good or bad?
>
>
-
BeestonBoy
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: habeas corpus
Kinda linking this into a couple of other current threads....wasn't the suspension of this one of the first acts passed by the Nazis?
'I see the usual gang of misfits and dope addicts are here'
Re: habeas corpus
And for persistant offenders?
Re: habeas corpus
The law applies equally to all.
Sorry, but dem's the rules. No exceptions.
Sorry, but dem's the rules. No exceptions.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: habeas corpus
jj wrote:
> The law applies equally to all.
> Sorry, but dem's the rules. No exceptions.
Except there are exceptions! The young offender, the female offender, are treated as exceptions.
> The law applies equally to all.
> Sorry, but dem's the rules. No exceptions.
Except there are exceptions! The young offender, the female offender, are treated as exceptions.
Re: habeas corpus
warren zevon rip wrote:
> Trumpton wrote:
>
> > jj wrote:
> >
> > > The law applies equally to all.
> > > Sorry, but dem's the rules. No exceptions.
> >
> > Except there are exceptions! The young offender, the female
> > offender, are treated as exceptions.
>
> But the young are also treated as exceptions in terms of not
> being allowed to vote, etc. So it seems logical that if they
> have no resonsibility for electing a government, they have less
> responsibility for their actions.
Ah, we have an agreement! The truth will out - eventually. "The young have less responsibilty for their actions". Herein this statement is the fundamental problem facing our society! The young can commit serious crimes and they know full well that when, or if, they are captured, they will be treated with leniency!
> Not sure what you mean by
> women being treated differently.
Female offenders are also treated with leniency.
> Trumpton wrote:
>
> > jj wrote:
> >
> > > The law applies equally to all.
> > > Sorry, but dem's the rules. No exceptions.
> >
> > Except there are exceptions! The young offender, the female
> > offender, are treated as exceptions.
>
> But the young are also treated as exceptions in terms of not
> being allowed to vote, etc. So it seems logical that if they
> have no resonsibility for electing a government, they have less
> responsibility for their actions.
Ah, we have an agreement! The truth will out - eventually. "The young have less responsibilty for their actions". Herein this statement is the fundamental problem facing our society! The young can commit serious crimes and they know full well that when, or if, they are captured, they will be treated with leniency!
> Not sure what you mean by
> women being treated differently.
Female offenders are also treated with leniency.