Home Sec - scrounger? You decide.

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Locked
andy at handiwork
Posts: 4113
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Home Sec - scrounger? You decide.

Post by andy at handiwork »

It goes without saying that if you or I, well you, were being investigated by the Social/HMCR/officialdom for possibly diddling the public purse to the tune of 100k, you can bet that you would be treated an awful lot different to how Smith is being dealt with. Immeadiate cessation of benefit, intrusive investigation of your circumstances, possible involvement of plod, irrespective of whether you thought you had broken the rules or not
andy at handiwork
Posts: 4113
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Home Sec - scrounger? You decide.

Post by andy at handiwork »

I can dream, cant I?
Dave Wells
Posts: 2717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Home Sec - scrounger? You decide.

Post by Dave Wells »

Firstly sack the fiddling bitch !

Dave Wells

http://www.dave-wells.co.uk
Dave Wells
Posts: 2717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

AND !

Post by Dave Wells »

And ! The other one's hubby has just four and half years for excepting a bribe from Bellosconi right. The Italian premier right, sorry the still Italian premier right - how can that be ?

Dave Wells

http://www.dave-wells.co.uk
colonel
Posts: 4156
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: AND !

Post by colonel »

Berlusconi passed a law giving himself immunity from prosecution for life- nice if you can do it.

Where is the fiddling from Smith? Can you explain exactly?

Because apart from one chavette ITN interviewed- probably a relative of Alfie 'Stud' Patten?-, there is no evidence of this non-offence!
Flat_Eric
Posts: 1859
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: AND !

Post by Flat_Eric »

colonel wrote:

>>


I believe that's being looked into right now, colonel.

But whatever they ultimately find, Andy makes a valid point in his initial post.

I think that the outcome is predictable enough though: "No further action". The establishment (Labour or Tory - it doesn't matter) are very good at looking after each other.

But in any case, even in the extremely unlikely event that she's found to have a case to answer, I'd say that the danger of her being arrested and thus added to the DNA database is virtually nil.

- Eric
randyandy
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: AND !

Post by randyandy »

Now lets get real shall we.

Firstly there is no way to condone what has been done, as far as I am concerned, however it looks like it's within the rules which, far from nothing being done, are being looked at.

Anyone who says they won't or wouldn't use grey areas if they were aware of them for their own gain is a liar.

So she has done (if proved) exactly what most here would do given half the chance.

Wrong? Yes

Worth ranting about? Probably but only for the right reasons

Pretending you wouldn't do it given half the chance? Silly

and Eric is right the party doesn't matter it's down to the person and if they chose to claim it.

dynatech
Posts: 644
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: AND !

Post by dynatech »

Jackboot Jacquie is the ultimate Orwellian nouveaux hypocrite

They're locking them up today, they're throwing away the key...I wonder who it be tomorrow, you or me?
mrmcfister
Posts: 1672
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Home Sec - scrounger? You decide.

Post by mrmcfister »

Randy..no disagree.The woman is a snout in trough fiddler like so many of her ilk.No wonder so many are turned off by UK politics.
Locked