Paige Ashley in NOTW

[paige ashley uk]

I have never posted before but could not help it today , some of your comments are really not very nice !

Firstly , i am not trying to re-start my career as there is nothing wrong with it .
The story was twisted by the paper - not how i wanted them to write it and basically full of a load of shit !

I know i put myself out there and you all think that gives you a write to judge me but have you never heard " if you cant say anything nice then don't say anything at all " . Also i am sure i could sit around all day and make judgements about all you guys based on the posts on here and the amount of them but i don't !

I am happy with my career and my job can all you guys say the same thing ?

[JamesW]

"Anyone can be in the papers if you don't mind your pic shown. They pay ?200-?300 a story true or not."

What Dave Wells says is absolutely true. I know someone who had her pic in NOTW and she didn't even know what the full story was herself until it was published. It was basically the pic that she was being paid for.

[mrchapel]

paige ashley uk wrote:

> I have never posted before but could not help it today , some
> of your comments are really not very nice !

Expecting nice comments from people on the internet is bad enough but expecting them here?

> Firstly , i am not trying to re-start my career as there is
> nothing wrong with it .
> The story was twisted by the paper - not how i wanted them to
> write it and basically full of a load of shit !

You expected them not to twist it? Maybe you should post here more often and learn something everyone else seems to know. Don`t trust the mainsteam media, whether its a reporter from Aussie fuckwit murdoch`s cesspool or an up their arse documentry maker from channel 4, they`re all dishonest pricks who`ve got their own agendas, which never include portraying porn in a good light.


> I know i put myself out there and you all think that gives you
> a write to judge me but have you never heard " if you cant say
> anything nice then don't say anything at all " . Also i am sure
> i could sit around all day and make judgements about all you
> guys based on the posts on here and the amount of them but i
> don't !
>
> I am happy with my career and my job can all you guys say the
> same thing ?

I had something witty and intelligent in mind but I can`t be bothered.

[Harry Hardon]

Yes - I am happy

[James_Accountant]

Paige, I hope your career is going well and wish you every success in the future.

[hiwatt]

Clearly some clarification needed:

Paige now has her own production company PURE PAIGE PRODUCTIONS, which already has contracts with Bluebird & Private. Her company has shot 3 movies already and Paige just wrapped PLAY MISTY FOR ME in LA.

So her career in adult could hardly be going any better.

Paige did the NOW story with Bluebird's knowledge and support. NOW wanted someone to 'front' their not-Belle de Jour story. Paige accepted their financial offer to do it. A purely business decision.

As usual, NOW did some twists on the basic agreed story which Paige wasn't happy with simply because she thought they were just too silly.

If anyone believes that a single word of it is true, then that is either a testament to NOW's professional ability to convince, or readers' profound gullibility.

Pip Pip.

!wink!

[Sam Slater]

Are you saying the NOTW lied?

I've dealt with the NOTW a few times and they'll have recorded/written out what was said in the interview (while paying for your meal and drinks), and let Paige read and sign, allowing them to use anything.

Papers have been known to lie before, but on a story that they just see as 'filler' they wouldn't embellish in such an outrageous manner which would leave them open to legal action.

It's just a few grumpy men on a porn forum that got a little critical. Let them have their say, let Paige earn her money and all's well. No need heavily imply the story is false; it just puts the paper and Paige in a bad light unnecessarily.

[JamesW]

"they wouldn't embellish in such an outrageous manner which would leave them open to legal action."

But the News Of The World are frequently subject to legal action, so why would they worry about leaving themselves open to legal action now? It doesn't seem to have ever bothered them before.

[Harry Hardon]

Err - maybe I missed it but I don't recall anyone asking whether Bluebird or any other production company knew anything about this story.

Personally, I don't care - I just think it's strange that some models who escort or do parties are frowned upon or blacklisted whilst others are welcomed with open armed.

Then again, the porn industry and consistent behaviour have never been good bedfellows

[planeterotica]

Good luck to Paige and after going public in the NOTW her carreer can only flourish, think of Abi Titmus and others there is no such thing as bad publicity in the adult world, well not often anyway !wink!