32 years in jail for the 'London Fields' duo..

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
David Johnson
Posts: 7844
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Phil/Turan Hosting

Post by David Johnson »

I can only assume Turan lives in "Darling Buds of May" country. Berk(ely hunt). And I've just commenced my critique."

Oh no Turan, you have disagreed again. Critique?

Cheers
D
BRFOT
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Lizard

Post by BRFOT »

David, do you deny the fact that the vast majority of gang violence in London is committed by immigrants or 2nd/3rd generation descendents of immigrants despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary?

If not then why do you try and make intimations of racism against those who have the temerity to point it out?
David Johnson
Posts: 7844
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

brfot

Post by David Johnson »

I see absolutely nothing in my posts on this thread which can be interpreted

as "why do you try and make intimations of racism against those who have the temerity to point it out?"

Cheers
D
BRFOT
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: brfot

Post by BRFOT »

"Must be all them immigrants.

Excuse me Lizard, but are you an immigrant?"

Sorry what relevance does this have?

"By say the 1950s and 1960s the UK had taken hundreds of years to become a fairly safe and civilised society. It was a great country to live in."

"Yeah it was the West Indian migration of the 60s that helped to make it such a "great country to live in"

What relevance does this have again? Other then West Indians are black, why point this out other than to intimate racism while simultaneously drawing attention to your own righteous standpoint?
max_tranmere
Posts: 4734
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: 32 years in jail for the 'London Fields' duo..

Post by max_tranmere »

turan, the curfew would cut crime to a certain extent but if a gang member is going to take out another gang member then he is obviouslly doing somehing illegal so the much more minor thing of walking the streets at night illegally is something he will risk aswell. All that will happen is you will get 'daytime hits' rather than night time ones.
max_tranmere
Posts: 4734
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: 32 years in jail for the 'London Fields' duo..

Post by max_tranmere »

turan, they have certainly cleaned up the West End. I remember when I was a kid the sleaze district was massive - it was all of Soho (rather than just the few little streets it is today), the whole area south of Shaftsbury Avenue, Wardour Street, a lot of what is now Chinatown, and I recall sex shops along the nothern side of Leicester Square. So much of that region is now posh restuarants, clubs, and ordinary shops, and the smut district has shrunk considerably. However, parts of south and east London, that were always poor and run down, are still poor and run down and now full of guns, knives, and serious organised gangs. That wasn't happening years ago. There is very little differnce today between a lot of inner city London and inner city Los Angeles. It is sad, because it is something I never thought would happen.
max_tranmere
Posts: 4734
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Lizard

Post by max_tranmere »

BRFOT, I agree.
David Johnson
Posts: 7844
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: brfot

Post by David Johnson »

"By say the 1950s and 1960s the UK had taken hundreds of years to become a fairly safe and civilised society. It was a great country to live in.

Then we began to let people in from countries that are either "third world" level or war torn (like Somalia that has had no effective government for about 30 years).

Above is Guilbert's initial remarks. What Guilbert doesnt appear to realise is that the main African/Caribbean movements into this country happened in the immediate post war period between 1948 and the early 60's. Now no disrespect to the people of the Caribbean but their standard of living at the time equated to what we would now call "third world" to use Guilbert's term.

So Guilbert is talking about Britain being a safe and civilised soceity in the 60's after Britain had seen one of the biggest influx of Afro-Caribbean migrants in its history for the previous 20 years. Hence my comment --

Yeah it was the West Indian migration of the 60s that helped to make it such a "great country to live in"

Given the racial (note I use the word racial not racist) nature of many of the comments in this thread, my comment to Lizard was purely offhand based on his not particularly strong argument "Its total bollocks"

Cheers
D
max_tranmere
Posts: 4734
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

David...

Post by max_tranmere »

I dont think anyone is saying that immigration has been a completely bad thing, people came because there was a labour shortage in the post-war years and worked hard. People also had a right to come as they were British passport holders from former British colonies. Some of the descendants of those hard working descent people seem to have lost their way though. Brixton, Harlesden, Dalston, Notting Hill and other inner city areas, were full of hard working immigrant people in the 50s and 60s. They still are, but they is a lot of dissaffected lost youth there now aswell.
Locked